Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Plagiarism
The article by Brook Sadler gives ten quick arguments for what is wrong with internet plagiarism. A couple key ideas for why internet plagiarism is wrong are the issue of copyrights and theft of someone else's property, plagiarism involves the intent to deceive professor's and higher education by using someone else's work. Plagiarism is unfair to other students because it takes away from their honest work. Plagiarism is diminishing the students education and in turn teaching them that cheating is ok. He believes that a strict poicy works best such as failing the course if any assignment is determined to be plagiarised. Russel Hunt's four reasons to be happy about internet plagiarism gives reasons for which certain practices are threatened by the increasing ease of plagiarism. He believes that our institutional rhetorical writing environment is challenged by this and it is a good thing and that the problem can be addressed by assuring the students that they are real writers with meaningful and important things to say. That the institutional structures around grades are challenged which is good because the system that is built makes students only care about marks, credits, and certificates. By pushing students, he believes that we can break the pattern in students of cheating. Personally, I agree with Sadler because I think that cheating and plagiarism is wrong because I put in alot of hard work into my school and for someone to get a better grade because they cheated isnt fair.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good post. I think that Sadler did a very good job of presenting the ideas that surround plagiarism and theft in academia. Hunt presents and interesting point of view that I had not thought of before but I think that I agree with you. He is off base. Theft is still wrong. I think that he is trying to use plagiarism to argue a bigger point. That he is unhappy with how education is gauged in our culture and points to plagiarism as one of the culprits. Sadler brings us back to base and makes very good points about how educational integrity can carry on into our careers and affect the kind of person we are.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you on the fact that plagiarism is not fair. There is nothing more frustrating than having a bell-curve thrown off, or getting a worse grade than someone that cheated. In the sense of the actual principle, I agree with Sadler, however I do think that Hunt had a better overall argument. I would have liked to see Sadler provide some alternatives to help preventing plagiarism, rather than simply pointing out the reasons it is wrong. Plagiarism definitely is stealing, but what are some alternatives? Should the system advance? In order to strengthen her argument I think she needed to throw out some ideas on this.
ReplyDelete